03:03 pm
Seven Years Later: From Tragedy to Denial
Given everything going on around the election — lipstick, pigs, sex, wolves, seals and all sorts of other so very important matters — you might have missed this little gem, from yesterday’s White House press briefing:
Perino’s claim that Khaled Sheikh Mohammed, not Osama bin Laden, was the “mastermind” of the 9/11 attacks is so staggeringly and blatantly a lie that it’s hard to know where to start. For the Administration to cover up its failure to capture bin Laden by arguing the detention of KSM somehow matters more, is akin to suggesting that Radovan Karadzic’s arrest absovled Soblodan Milosevic of any responsibility for what happened in Bosnia.
Whenever any leader makes a decision, there are two levels of responsibility: strategic and tactical. The person who identifies the direction that an organization or country or business is going to take determines the strategy. The person who designs and implements the actions necesssary to implement the strategy determines the tactics.
In this case, Osama bin Laden chose the strategy — attacking the United States. Khaled Sheikh Mohammed decided the tactics — how and where to make the attack a reality. It is just mind-boggling that the Bush Administration doesn’t understand — or is pretending not to understand — the difference.
Just in case it’s the former, permit me to remind Ms. Perino and her boss what Osama bin Laden said in his first interview (with Taysir Alluni, al-Jazeera’s Afghanistan bureau chief) after the September 11 attacks. The transcript is from Messages to the World: The Statements of Osama bin Laden:
As far as concerns [America's] description of these attacks as terrorist acts, that description is wrong. These young men, for whom God has created a path, have shifted the battle to the heart of the United States, and they have destroyed its most oustanding landmarks, its economic and military landmarks, by the grace of God. And they have done this because of our words — and we have previously incited and roused them to action. . . . And if inciting for these reasons is terrorism, and if killing those that kill our sons is terrorism, then let history witness that we are terrorists. . . .
Making connections is easy. If this implies that we have incited these attacks, then yes, we’ve been inciting for years, and we have released decrees and documents concerning this issue, and other incitements which were published and broadcast in the media. So if they mean, or if you mean, that there is a connection as a result of our incitement, then that is true. So we incite, and incitement is a duty. . . .
I say that the events that happened on Tuesday September 11 in New York and Washington are truly great events by any measure, and their repercussions are not yet over. . . .These repercussions cannot be calculated by anyone due to their very large — and increasing — scale, multitude and complexity, so watch as the amount reaches no less than $1 trillion by the lowest estimate, due to thise successful and blessed attacks. We implore God to accept those brothers within the ranks of the martyrs and to admit them to the highest levels of Paradise.
Now I know that Ms. Perino is not a lawyer, neither is President Bush. I’m not either. But unlike me, they’re surrounded by some of the top legal minds in the country. One of them just might want to explain to Bush and Perino the concepts of conspiracy and incitement. It just might clarify things a little.
Then again, those are the same lawyers who told Bush that torture was okay. So maybe not.
Related posts
| posted in American foreign policy, war & rumors of war | 0 Comments
Loading ...