<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Awesome Redux!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.undiplomatic.net/2009/02/19/awesome-redux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.undiplomatic.net/2009/02/19/awesome-redux/</link>
	<description>Bringing foreign policy back, girl.  Those other countries don't know how to act.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 18:33:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark Woodward</title>
		<link>http://www.undiplomatic.net/2009/02/19/awesome-redux/#comment-15296</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Woodward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 04:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.undiplomatic.net/?p=2700#comment-15296</guid>
		<description>This misses the point. There was a very serious public relations/public diplomacy blunder because in all of the press photos and video Sec. Clinton did not once appear with a woman wearing a jilbab -- Muslim headscarf. Many Muslim femininist felnt snubbed and that by this ommission Clinton sent a powerful anti-Islamic message.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This misses the point. There was a very serious public relations/public diplomacy blunder because in all of the press photos and video Sec. Clinton did not once appear with a woman wearing a jilbab &#8212; Muslim headscarf. Many Muslim femininist felnt snubbed and that by this ommission Clinton sent a powerful anti-Islamic message.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

