Undiplomatic Banner
5th January 2009 Charles J. Brown
04:12 pm

A Few Additional Thoughts on the Panetta Pick


In my last post, I asked whether the mandarins at Langley would listen to an outsider.  It therefore might be useful to remember the last time someone from the real world tried to run the place:  Porter Goss.

Let’s not mince words:  Goss was a complete disaster.  Despite his many years in Congress (or perhaps because of them), he couldn’t manage his way out of a paper bag.  His purge of senior and mid-level officials helped gut the CIA of many of its most talented officers.  He hired cronies to staff key posts, leading to several scandals (see Foggo, Dusty).

Seal of the Central Intelligence Agency of the...

In addition, Goss apparently was under orders to get rid of officers perceived as openly sympathetic to the Kerry campaign.  The end result was a significant decline in the CIA’s capability.

So this is not the best analogy.  Unlike Goss, Panetta is neither inexperienced in the ways of a large bureaucratic organization nor a total idiot political hack.  Nonetheless, he would be wise to look carefully at the experience of Goss — as well as others, like Stansfield Turner — who were given a mandate to fix the agency only to crash and burn.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
This entry was posted on Monday, January 5th, 2009 at 4:12 pm and is filed under American foreign policy, politics, war & rumors of war. It is tagged under , . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

There are currently 3 responses to “A Few Additional Thoughts on the Panetta Pick”

Why not let us know what you think by adding your own comment! Your opinion is as valid as anyone else's, so come on... let us know what you think.

  1. 1 On January 5th, 2009, Midwest McGarry said:

    Interesting comments from Moira Whelan at Democracy Arsenal:
    “[Panetta] knows how brains work inside the West Wing because he was there as White House Chief of Staff, and therefore will know how to provide information that gets attention in the way it should.”
    http://www.democracyarsenal.org/2009/01/panetta.html

    Meanwhile, Noah Schactman at the Danger Room blog has collected a few thoughts under a post titled “Spooks Scratch Their Heads Over Obama CIA Pick.”
    http://blog.wired.com/defense/2009/01/the-incoming-ob.html

  2. 2 On January 5th, 2009, Montserrat Nicolas said:

    What? Our dear spies didn’t know about the Panetta pick????
    This is what the CIA has become? An all-out ignorance pool?
    No wiretapping? Nothing???
    Wait.
    Ups.
    I forgot ‘they’ are not allowed to spy on Americans.
    :)

  3. 3 On January 6th, 2009, Ross said:

    Tough words from Andrew Sullivan:

    “Feinstein and Rockefeller sense a real individual with real clout at the agency, whom they cannot control. There may have been a lack of foresight here in not phoning Feinstein ahead of time. But it is also indisputable that many leading intelligence Democrats were deeply complicit in the Bush torture program and his illegal wire-tapping. It was just as important for the president-elect to pick someone not beholden to them either.”

    http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2009/01/the-opposition.html

Leave a Reply

CAPTCHA image

  • Twitter

    • Could not connect to Twitter