Undiplomatic Banner
5th December 2008 Charles J. Brown
01:26 pm

The Real Face of the Big Three Bailout


Over the past few weeks, the heads of the so-called “Big Three” American automakers have repeatedly gone to Congress to plead for a bailout.  At first media coverage focused on the (legitimate) outrage over the CEOs using separate private jets to come to DC.  Then, this week, we’ve had the circus of watching the same, now supposedly contrite, men arrive after driving 500 miles in hybrid cars.  Throughout, we’ve had the skepticism (and posturing) of Members of Congress, who are holding the country’s largest remaining industry (which, by one account I’ve seen, is responsible for generating jobs for 1 out of every 10 Americans) to a much higher standard than they did the crooks, con-men, and charlatans on Wall Street.

I hold no brief for the Big Three.  For decades now they’ve put short-term profits over long-term thinking.  They’ve sacrificed American strategic interests (and their long-term prosperity) in order to sell big, ugly, gas-guzzling SUVs and trucks.  They have decimated entire communities by outsourcing jobs either overseas or to other parts of the United States — mainly the South — where unions aren’t nearly as powerful.  They’ve proven themselves incapable of streamlining, restructuring, or retooling in a way to make themselves more competitive.  They have brought their problems on themselves, and on one level they deserve to die.

But this is crazy.  We’ve just dumped at least $500 billion into a series of ratholes — AIG, Citi, Bear Stearns, etc. — that contribute no real value to the economy other than to move money around.  But now, we are told, we should not spend significantly less to save hundreds of thousands of people from joblessness.

Does anyone seriously believe that the collapse of the auto industry won’t have a cascade effect?  The first to go will be the auto parts infrastructure that feeds these behemoths.  Then other businesses (large and small) no longer will have the customer base to sustain themselves. (Does anyone seriously think that, say, Wal-Mart will keep stores open if nobody is buying anything?)  Finally, local and state governments will no longer have the tax base necessary to sustain a range of public services.

If there is an equation for a second Great Depression, it has to involve destroying the economy of an entire region in the name of teaching some fat cats a lesson.

As I’ve watched this spectacle, I’ve wondered why Congress isn’t asking the people most affected — the workers — to testify.  This new ad by UAW isn’t a replacement, but it’s an important step toward moving beyond the CEOs to see the real face of the bailout:

I’m a Michigander by birth (though I was raised in Florida).  When I was a kid, there were two iron laws in our family:  go to church and buy American cars.  To this day, when Molly and I return to visit family (she’s also from Michigan), the overwhelming majority of cars on the road are either American-built or American-owned.  Michiganders — even those who don’t work (directly or indirectly) for the automakers — are fiercely loyal to and protective of what they recognize is the foundation of their economy.

We’re not merely talking about the death of an industry here.  We’re talking about the end of a dream and a way of life.  It is the autoworker, after all, that exemplified the potential of mid-20th Century America — a place where you could work a blue collar job, earn a nice middle-class living, and put your kids through college.  It is the Midwest, after all, that was, until the 1970s, the economic engine that drove prosperity throughout the United States.

Abandoned Fisher Body Plant, Detroit

Much of that already is gone.  Here’s what I wrote a few months ago while visiting Michigan:

When I was a kid, my dad was the editor of The Saginaw News.  When we moved there (the summer of 1966), Saginaw was still a fairly prosperous city, with two major plants — Saginaw Steering Gear and Gray Iron Foundry (later Central Foundry) — providing a large number of people the chance to live a middle-class existence.  It was a tradition that everybody worked in one or the other at some point. My brother spent several summers working at one, and my then-brother-in-law started on the line and eventually ended up as an executive after GM helped put him through college.

But the automakers weren’t the only source of prosperity:  Wickes Lumber, a legacy of the years when Saginaw was one of the great lumber processing towns, remained a major employer, and several other large companies contributed as well.  The downtown was in fairly good shape, with several large department stores, including Morley Brothers and Heavenrich’s, as well as the Saginaw Hotel and the newspaper, serving as anchors.

By the time we moved to Ann Arbor (August 1973), the rot already was evident  There were multiple causes:  the 1967 Detroit riots (and 1968 riots elsewhere) caused many whites in the city to flee to the surrounding township; the first mall (Fashion Square) opened outside the city, leading many businesses to move out of downtown and leading those that tried to stay to fail; Wickes consolidated its offices elsewhere; and, of course, the energy crisis, which, combined with competition from Japan, began the Big Three’s long, slow decline (Central Foundry relocated in 1977).

Today, downtown is almost completely empty, most industries are gone, and only the continued presence of Saginaw Steering Gear keeps the city going.  That’s only one story.  Despite its occasional exaggerations, Michael Moore’s Roger and Me is a fairly accurate picture of Flint’s decline.  And there are far too many others.

To let the auto industry die would be to witness the epic failure of Saginaw — and all the other cities and towns that are only barely hanging on as it is.  These workers (and the cities they live in) will face the economic equivalent of Katrina.  If anyone thinks this month’s job loss figures are bad, just wait until the automakers go under.

There are plenty of ways to structure a bailout so as to ensure that it accomplishes not merely the existence of the Big Three, but their reinvention.  These include mandates on changing leadership, a significant paring of lines and models, a cutback on gas-guzzlers, subsidization of alternative technologies, the retooling of plants for other projects (such as high-speed rail), and even some sort of leveraged support that would allow the companies to restructure without actually calling it bankruptcy.

So enough already.  Congress needs to stop moaning about the people running these companies and start thinking about the hundreds of thousands who will suffer if we don’t do the right thing.  Bush needs to do the right thing by signing whatever Congress puts in front of him.  And President-elect Obama needs to speak out more forcefully in favor of a solution.

We can’t afford the consequences of inaction.

Photo:  Derek Farr via Flickr, used under a CC 3.0 license

This entry was posted on Friday, December 5th, 2008 at 1:26 pm and is filed under global economy, politics, world events. It is tagged under , , . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

There are currently 3 responses to “The Real Face of the Big Three Bailout”

Why not let us know what you think by adding your own comment! Your opinion is as valid as anyone else's, so come on... let us know what you think.

  1. 1 On December 5th, 2008, Digger said:

    I didn’t mean to imply that all politically appointed senior people within the Department are not talented and capable. The Assistant Secretary in my bureau, for example, is very talented and capable and is also a political appointee. Lots of the senior political appointees are. But particularly among political appointee ambassadors, there are a lot who lack qualifications beyond knowing (or having contributed to) the President.

    The folks in the list above don’t fall into that category. They are a talented and experienced bunch who I have confidence will serve the Secretary and the Department well. And I recognize the need for some political appointees. It is natural for a new Secretary to want to have advisors she already trusts and can depend on. But I guess I think the practice could be scaled back. In much the same way as real diversity can be achieved not by lowering standards but by casting a wider net, more of the senior postions could be filled by the rank and file of the Department if only our leaders would notice the talent base that is here.

  2. 2 On December 5th, 2008, Digger said:

    Oh, but I will say that if there are anxious conversations in the cooridors about Clinton’s selections and of people being “frozen out” of influential positions, I haven’t heard them.

  3. 3 On December 8th, 2008, Ross said:

    This is something Kate and I have been discussing, as have many Michiganders, for quite some time–what appears to be the final gust of an ‘economic Katrina’ that is set to demolish southeast Michigan as we know it.

    We have multiple family members who have worked for GM, a couple of whom are drawing on pensions at present, but we are also environmental advocates by vocation, so we have been frustrated at the big 3’s downright obstinacy with respect to mileage standards, and all the attendant petroleum/national security/climate change ramifications.

    Leaving that aside, however, as you describe above, is the all-to-real fact that failure of what we know as “Detroit’s Auto-Industry” *WILL* result in an economic catastrophe in Michigan that will dwarf this severe one-state recession we’ve already been living in for 8 years now.

    In other words, and I wish someone like Senators Levin or Stabenow or Governor Granholm (or anyone with a megaphone big enough to shout this important declaration from an MSM mountain-top high-enough for people nation-wide to hear (and understand) it) would just come out and clearly state the fact that the failure of the big 3 in the terms being bandied about by talking heads everywhere will wipe out middle class families in this state. period. (To say nothing of the effects on the poor, which will undoubtedly be (and in many instances, already are) more severe, as donations to food banks & charities dry up with a declination in disposable income across the board)

    The double-standard (b/w bailout treatment of wall-street vs. blue-collar-working main street) is certainly felt acutely here, and there appears to really be no more “give” in the safety nets of anyone in the region. People have already been tapping their savings, 401ks, etc. just to pay the bills… when those finally dry up, there is nothing left. Lose the jobs on top of it and who knows what will become of this once-proud manufacturing hub.

    One might make the argument that the decline of the automotive industry in Michigan, and its correlative effects on the southeast Michigan community, has been taking place since the riots of ‘67, and that Coleman Young (apart from whatever most people think of him) was unable to stem the adverse economic tides of the ’80’s (inflation, etc.), and that the core of the city has just continued to limp along since then, without any real or apparent ability to pull itself out of it’s doldrums (as did Houston, Denver, etc.) and revitalize itself to an extent that would be sustainable, with or without the big 3, such that the failure of a bailout package could not be the only thing causing Detroit’s issues at the moment.

    However, I really feel that is the wrong way to look at it. Despite all those problems, Detroit–the city, the community–has been working diligently to bring itself back, diversify, attract new business downtown, expand public transit with a woodward light-rail system, etc. over the past few years… picture us as a fighter who’s been knocked down a bit, but is getting back up on his/her feet. Those arguing against the bailout also seem to have only begun paying attention to the industry 2 weeks ago, and have missed the fact that there has been a significant amount of restructuring and redirection taking place over the past few years, with major assistance/concessions from the unions, new vehicle programs (eg. the Volt for GM; Ford’s hybrid line), and legacy cost cutting where possible. People here know what has been happening, and have been working to address the problems.

    Failure to extend a bridge loan, however, or to help the automakers get through the biggest financial crisis in generations with a sliver of the money that was thrown at wall-street without any questions being asked will amount to no less than taking a two-by-four to the back of every hard-working Michigander just as they struggle up from the mat.

    Of course, Saginaw, Flint, Warren, etc. will continue to decline even further, and you will see a rapid descent into the second failed-state region/economy of the past four years: 1. New Orleans, 2. Detroit.

    I guess this is a rather long way of agreeing with you, and echoing much of what you’ve said above… Thanks for giving voice (from outside the region) to the perspective of those of us here who’re still holding out hope that the vital, years-long turn-around process (and that’s what it takes folks, by the way, it’d be nice to just infuse cash into a struggling bank and be done with it, but industrial change of this scale takes time) will not be stifled and stymied by a short-sighted Congress that appears not to recognize the fire with which they are playing…

Leave a Reply

CAPTCHA image

    Add to Technorati Favorites

  • Contact Me

  • cbrown_at_ undiplomatic_dot_net

  • Polls

  • Was Obama's Trip to Asia...

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...
  • Archive