Undiplomatic Banner
1st October 2008 Charles J. Brown
08:45 am

Forget Bush v. Gore — Palin Forgot about Exxon v. Baker


Apparently, the worst is yet to come for Sarah Palin.  According to a number of sources, CBS will air the last part of its interview with her tonight.  It’s not good news for the McCain campaign

Of concern to McCain’s campaign, however, is a remaining and still-undisclosed clip from Palin’s interview with Couric last week that has the political world buzzing.  The Palin aide, after first noting how “infuriating” it was for CBS to purportedly leak word about the gaffe, revealed that it came in response to a question about Supreme Court decisions.

After noting Roe vs. Wade, Palin was apparently unable to discuss any major court cases.  There was no verbal fumbling with this particular question as there was with some others, the aide said, but rather silence.

Every school kid learns a few Supreme Court cases.  Roe v. Wade is one, but so are Marbury v. Madison, Dredd Scott, Plessy v. FergusonBrown v. Board of Education, even Bush v. Gore.

She. Didn’t. Freaking. Know.

But just for a moment, let’s give the Sarahnator the benefit of the doubt.  Maybe she was sick the week her high school civics class covered the Supreme Court.  Maybe the Alaska Independence Party got a law passed prohibiting any mention of Supreme Court cases in Alaska’s school curriculum.  Maybe none of the six colleges she attended offered an American History class (or maybe she didn’t take any).

Even then, there’s a small problem:  Exxon v. Baker, from June of this year:

The Supreme Court on Wednesday reduced what had once been a $5 billion punitive damages award against Exxon Mobil to about $500 million. The ruling essentially concluded a legal saga that started when the Exxon Valdez, a supertanker, struck a reef and spilled 11 million gallons of crude oil into the Prince William Sound in Alaska in 1989.

And it’s not like Sunshine Sarah didn’t know about it:

Public officials in Alaska are reacting strongly to the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision Wednesday to slash the $2.5 billion damage award to Alaska fishermen to $508 million, nearly 20 years after the Exxon Valdez disaster. . . .

Gov. Sarah Palin [said,]  “I am extremely disappointed with today’s decision by the U.S. Supreme Court,” Palin said. “While the decision brings some degree of closure to Alaskans suffering from 19 years of litigation and delay, the court gutted the jury’s decision on punitive damages.”

Palin added, “It is tragic that so many Alaska fishermen and their families have had their lives put on hold waiting for this decision. My heart goes out to those affected, especially the families of the thousands of Alaskans who passed away while waiting for justice.”

Palin said the decision today undercut one of the principal legs of deterrence for those engaged in maritime shipping in Alaska waters. She called on state and federal agencies to be vigilant and firm in regulating such activities.

This was a huge deal in Alaska, generating bipartisan outrage.  Palin was right in the middle of it.  According to a friend who does public relations for progressive organizations, Palin appeared at several events to express her outrage over the decision.

Clearly she’s panicking.  She is so discombobulated, so completely freaked out that she can’t even remember the biggest Supreme Court case to hit Alaska in many years.  She isn’t stupid.  She’s cratering.

Either that, or Katie Couric scares the living crap out of her.  That doesn’t exactly reassure me that a President Palin could stare down Hu Jintao or Vladimir Putin.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
This entry was posted on Wednesday, October 1st, 2008 at 8:45 am and is filed under American foreign policy, global economy, media, politics, world events. It is tagged under , , , , . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

There are currently 4 responses to “Forget Bush v. Gore — Palin Forgot about Exxon v. Baker”

Why not let us know what you think by adding your own comment! Your opinion is as valid as anyone else's, so come on... let us know what you think.

  1. 1 On October 1st, 2008, Tburke99 said:

    Merely because the Alaska Governor’s Office issued a statement and “quoted” Sarah Palin does not mean that she ever uttered the quoted words, or even read the statement before it was issued.

    Even so, since the McCain campaign insists on touting her executive experience in Alaska, it is not tto much to expcet her to recall a decision of such importance to the state that was three months old.

  2. 2 On October 1st, 2008, Pansy said:

    You should really note your sources. This is a total rip-off of We are Voting Yes at http://www.wearevotingyes.com/2008/09/sarah-palins-supreme-failure.html

  3. 3 On October 1st, 2008, Charles J. Brown said:

    Pansy,

    Thanks for the link to the We are Voting Yes story, which I had not seen before. I will add them to my RSS reader.

    You’re correct in pointing out that my story and their story highlighted many of the same sources, but I would note that I had sources that they did not, including the story out of Anchorage quoting Palin’s press release. In addition, they cited sources that I did not find, to their credit.

    The fact of the matter is that I found my material via Google after I typed in the words “Alaska” and “Supreme Court.” It wasn’t that hard. In addition, were you able to access the part of my site where I actually write the posts, and went to this post, you would see the following:

    Last edited by Charles J. Brown on September 30, 2008 at 10:00 pm

    As you can see from that date stamp, I actually wrote this before We are Voting Yes — or at least simultaneously. As is often the case, I draft most of my morning posts the night before. Tomorrow, for example, you’ll see a post on Palin and intellectual curiosity.

    In this case, We are Voting Yes beat me to publishing, which is the price I pay for saving what I think is worthwhile content for the next morning rather than late at night.

    Next time I suggest you ask questions before you start accusing someone of ripping off another site. It’s a serious charge and should not be thrown around so cavalierly.

  4. 4 On October 1st, 2008, Chris Connelly said:

    Charles~

    I appreciate you allowing the link and providing the explanation; I had attempted to submit the very question you mentioned to Pansy earlier today, actually. I’m not sure why that didn’t go through; perhaps it did?

    I must admit that I too was a bit struck by the similarities in our posts, with the citations and the uses of humor/sarcasm - but I will take you at your word that we were likely working on it simultaneously. I look forward to reading more of your writing, and hope you’ll stop by from time to time to offer any comments you have on mine.

    Cheers,
    Chris

Leave a Reply

CAPTCHA image

    Add to Technorati Favorites
  • Contact Me

  • cbrown_at_ undiplomatic_dot_net
  • RSS Tweets

    • Could not connect to Twitter

  • Polls

  • Was Obama's Trip to Asia...

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...
  • Archive