<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Overnight Election Open Thread</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.undiplomatic.net/2008/09/26/overnight-election-open-thread/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.undiplomatic.net/2008/09/26/overnight-election-open-thread/</link>
	<description>Bringing foreign policy back, girl.  Those other countries don't know how to act.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 16:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: eidos</title>
		<link>http://www.undiplomatic.net/2008/09/26/overnight-election-open-thread/#comment-2460</link>
		<dc:creator>eidos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 04:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.undiplomatic.net/?p=1043#comment-2460</guid>
		<description>This is McCain's strong area and he did well. Considering how erratic his campaign was the last couple of weeks I was surprised to see him do so well. On the other hand McCain is starting to slip in the polls and he needed a strong knockout to revers that, which he didn't get. So Obama won in a sense just by not losing badly. All he really had to do was come across credibly as a commander in chief, which he did.

Because of the financial crisis there was big chunk of time spent on the economy that would not normally have been a part of this debate. Obama clearly did better there and that helped neutralize McCain's foreign affairs advantage.

It was a pretty dry, serious debate. We'll have to wait for the VP debate for comic relief.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is McCain&#8217;s strong area and he did well. Considering how erratic his campaign was the last couple of weeks I was surprised to see him do so well. On the other hand McCain is starting to slip in the polls and he needed a strong knockout to revers that, which he didn&#8217;t get. So Obama won in a sense just by not losing badly. All he really had to do was come across credibly as a commander in chief, which he did.</p>
<p>Because of the financial crisis there was big chunk of time spent on the economy that would not normally have been a part of this debate. Obama clearly did better there and that helped neutralize McCain&#8217;s foreign affairs advantage.</p>
<p>It was a pretty dry, serious debate. We&#8217;ll have to wait for the VP debate for comic relief.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

